Zenith of Desire: The Hollywood Incubus

Bonus Chapter!

Get those stones going boys and tomboys, we need to get those numbers up!

Join my Patreon

GodofPleasure

(dot)com/GodofPleasure

******

The album didn’t have a single word. Not one ”parental advisory” sticker in sight. And yet, it made grown men and women blush with a heat they couldn’t name.

”Eleven years old!” a lead critic barked on a late-night broadcast, slamming his fist onto a mahogany desk. ”Look at the composition of Battle Hymn. Look at the lyrical complexity of Song of Enchantment. You’re telling me a child—a boy who hasn’t even hit puberty—is the architect of this? No. Columbia Records is running a séance, and we’re the marks.”

The world couldn’t wrap its head around the genius, so they invented a conspiracy. They claimed Marvin was a vessel, a ghostwriter’s puppet, a cynical product of some shadowy boardroom. To believe he was real was to believe that nature had skipped a century of evolution just to create him.

But the real rot—the thing that truly terrified the ’Moral Guardians’—was the visceral reaction to the tracks.

When Song of Enchantment and I Need Your Happiness played, the room changed. Children heard the music and saw a sun-drenched field; they danced with a pure, untainted joy. But the adults? The adults felt a phantom ache. A low, thrumming desire that sat heavy in the gut. It was a lust not for the flesh, but for a beauty so intense it felt like a sin.

For a few days, people kept it a secret. They assumed the ”darkness” was only in their own minds. But then the Billboard charts updated.

Marvin didn’t just enter the Top 100; he colonized it. He sat on the throne of the Top 3 spots like a king. And as millions of households tuned in, the secret broke. The whispers turned into a roar. People started talking to each other in the grocery store aisles, in the pews of churches, over backyard fences.

”Did you feel it too?”

”Is it wrong to feel this way about a child’s song?”

The most desperate critics turned to a bizarre weapon: Perfection. They claimed the songs were too good. Too bright. Too hopeful. They argued that a song with zero flaws was a form of psychological warfare, a ”Deceptive Light” meant to blind the youth to the harsh realities of the world.

The world was fracturing in real-time. Some hailed him as a Second Coming, a vocal god sent to save a dying industry. Others saw him as a golden paradox that needed to be shattered before he ”corrupted” the very soul of the nation.

This profound philosophical excerpt opened the Sunday editorial of The Washington Post. It was a high-minded attempt to contextualize the cultural civil war that had erupted over an eleven-year-old boy.

By the second week of July, the conservative media apparatus had escalated from mild concern into an foaming-at-the-mouth frenzy.

Inside the Meyers home estate, Marvin sat comfortably in his high-backed velvet armchair, a porcelain teacup resting delicately in his hand. A wall of muted television monitors played a synchronized symphony of outrage. Talk shows, evening news broadcasts, and high-profile cultural critics were loudly condemning and heavily questioning Columbia Records.

The moral panic of the 1990s—an era already hyper-fixated on the ”corruption” of youth by explicit rap lyrics and violent video games—had suddenly found a paradoxical new target: an album without a single explicit word that somehow made grown, respectable adults blush, sweat, and completely lose their minds.

”It’s a complete circus, Boss,” Amy sighed, pacing in front of the monitors, clutching a thick stack of printed press clippings. ”The moment Marvin 1 locked down the top three spots on the Billboard Hot 100, the narrative flipped. We went from ’prodigy’ to ’public enemy’ in forty-eight hours.”

Marvin took a slow, elegant sip of his Earl Grey tea, his eyes reflecting the flashing lights of the screens. He didn’t look like an eleven-year-old in the center of a scandal; he looked like an emperor watching a highly entertaining gladiatorial match.

”Read me the charges, Amy,” Marvin purred, his resonant voice completely devoid of anxiety.

Amy adjusted her glasses, reading from the clippings. ”Charge one: You are entirely too mature. Several parental advocacy groups are arguing that your music has a subliminal, hypnotic tendency designed to corrupt children and bypass parental controls.

Charge two: Plagiarism and corporate fraud. A vocal faction of critics is outright questioning whether you are the original composer of these tracks, arguing that such complex, emotionally devastating music could not possibly be created by a child.”

”And the third charge?” Marvin asked, a knowing smirk playing on his flawless lips.

Amy’s cheeks flushed a sudden, brilliant shade of pink. She cleared her throat awkwardly. ”Charge three centers specifically around track two, I Need Your Happiness, and track five, Song of Enchantment. Some listeners... well, they are experiencing intense, physical reactions. They are accusing the tracks of broadcasting pure lust and desire.”

Marvin’s smirk widened into a breathtaking, devastatingly handsome smile. The Incubus within him was practically purring with satisfaction. The controversy was entirely predictable. When ordinary humans are suddenly forced to confront the absolute depths of their own hidden desires, their first instinct is always to burn the mirror.

”Let them scream, Amy,” Marvin said smoothly, setting his teacup down. ”Outrage is simply passion that hasn’t figured out how to monetize itself yet. The louder they yell, the more records we sell. But do not worry. The counter-attack has already been orchestrated.”

Marvin didn’t even have to lift a finger to defend himself. The sheer, undeniable brilliance of his work had already recruited the heavy artillery of the music world to fight his battles for him.

The next morning, the defensive lines were drawn.

Terrence Bolton, a notoriously strict and highly respected music critic in New York, fired the first shot in The New York Times, directly addressing the ghostwriter accusations.

> ”I spoke at length with Max Martin, the Swedish producer who engineered the album alongside Marvin,” Bolton wrote, his tone dripping with disdain for the skeptics. ”Martin told me with absolute, unwavering certainty that every single arrangement, vocal run, and composition was created and performed entirely by Marvin Meyers himself. He provided studio logs and raw audio stems as proof. Perhaps the limited, cynical minds of the masses simply cannot comprehend the existence of a true genius. But that is the nature of the world; it always surprises us. From Mozart and Liszt in the past to Marvin Meyers today, there are always extraordinary individuals who emerge to remind us of our own mediocrity.”

But it was Susie Cortes, the editor-in-chief of the New York-based Classical Music magazine, who delivered the academic kill shot regarding the ”erotic” controversy.

Susie did not rely on emotion; she relied on data.

> ”Marvin is a genius; there is absolutely no debate to be had on that front,” Cortes wrote in a sprawling, multi-page feature. ”If anyone wishes to publicly accuse this boy of plagiarism, then I demand you provide actual, admissible evidence, rather than relying on desperate conjectures to slander a musician who is clearly a gift from God to the global arts.

> ”As for those puritans screaming that Marvin’s music is ’filthy’ or ’corrupting’—I can only say that you are telling on yourselves. I recently tasked our magazine staff with interviewing one thousand diverse listeners—men, women, the elderly, and children—while monitoring their reactions to ’I Need Your Happiness.’

> ”The results were staggering. The impossible emotional depth woven into Marvin’s music is not a blanket broadcast of lust. It is a psychological mirror. The music does not force desire onto the listener; it actively reflects the listener’s own, deeply personal definition of true happiness and drags it to the forefront of their mind.

> ”For a young child, the song evokes the warm, safe embrace of his mother. For a grieving widower, it brings a vivid, tearful memory of their lost spouse. The music is objectively beautiful. If you are a fully grown adult and you are hearing explicit, erotic desire in a song without a single spoken word... it obviously depends entirely on what is already living inside your own mind when you listen to it.”

The article sent a shockwave through the cultural landscape. It was a brilliant, devastating psychological reversal.

But the final, apocalyptic blow to the critics came from Vanity Fair.

The headline dominated newsstands globally: The Midnight Miracle at the Althorp Gala: Why the Skeptics are Silently, Shamefully Wrong.

Even the Billboard Top 100—an institution rarely known for poetic sentiment or editorializing—was forced to amend its Sunday publication with a definitive, almost reverent post-scriptum referencing the article: These are, beyond a shadow of a doubt, the seminal works of Marvin Meyers.

The Vanity Fair piece was a masterclass in elite name-dropping, designed to completely crush the populist outrage under the weight of global royalty and high society.

> ”To question the provenance of these compositions is not merely an act of musical skepticism; it is an embarrassing admission of social irrelevance,” the article began ruthlessly. ”Have the moralizing critics so quickly forgotten the Gala of Grace hosted by Lady Diana at Althorp House? That evening, the air of the grand charity ballroom was thick with more than just the scent of vintage orchids and old money. It was the night of the ’Great Wager,’ where an eleven-year-old Marvin Meyers stood fearlessly before the gilded gatekeepers of the Western world and challenged the veteran titan, Grant Brook.

> ”For those claiming this child is a studio-manufactured fraud, I invite you to review the witness list for that live, unedited performance. It reads like the private ledger of a secret world order. In the front row sat:

> ”The Royal House: Both Princes of England, their famous royal composure completely broken by the boy’s first note.

> ”The Titans of Finance: A senior scion of the Rothschild dynasty, the reclusive German Otto family, and the Ruben Brothers—men who buy and sell nations before breakfast, all silenced by a single voice.

> ”The Cultural Icons: Isabella Adjani, looking on with the intensity of a tragic muse, alongside the heirs to the Ferrero empire and global superstar David Beckham, all frozen in a collective, breathless trance.

> ”These were the very first ears on the planet to be pierced by the haunting, visceral, and ultimately shattering vocals of ’The Battle Hymn.’ It was a live vocal execution so absolute, so devastatingly pure, that it did more than just win a charity bet; it effectively, permanently ended the career of Grant Brook. When a young boy’s raw voice forces a veteran of the music industry into a permanent, shameful exile, you do not question the talent. You fear it.

> ”So, to the ’moral’ critics, the television pundits, and the digital masses currently projecting erotic subtext onto the work of an eleven-year-old child: Look to the elite. Look to the bankers, the royals, and the legends who stood in that hall. They did not hear ’scandal.’ They heard a masterpiece.

> ”If you see darkness in the wordless melody of a boy, perhaps it is not the song that is stained. Perhaps it is your own reflection. Ask yourselves: Is the music truly erotic, or is your imagination simply too common, too base, to understand the sublime?”

The effect was instantaneous and catastrophic for Marvin’s detractors.

As soon as the Classical Music study and the Vanity Fair article hit the mainstream circulation, the loud criticisms subsided into a terrified, dead silence.

The music media had executed a psychological trap. By explicitly highlighting the line: ”projecting erotic subtext onto the work of a child,” the journalists had essentially weaponized shame.

It was the ultimate, inescapable checkmate. To continue protesting the album, to continue screaming that the music was ”lustful,” was now tantamount to a public confession of deviancy. It was basically standing up in a crowded room and screaming, ”I am projecting my own dirty, perverted thoughts onto a child’s art!”

And because the work contained absolutely no language, no lyrics, and no explicit visual cues, there was no defense. You couldn’t blame the wordless. You could only blame your own dark, internal thoughts.

Absolutely nobody in the public eye was willing to commit career suicide by speaking out against the boy now.

In the span of forty-eight hours, the cultural hypocrisy became entertaining.

In coffee shops across Los Angeles, New York, and London, people who had vividly, breathlessly experienced the overwhelming Incubus magic in I Need Your Happiness completely changed their tunes in public.

”Oh, yes, I listened to track two,” a wealthy socialite was overheard saying nervously at a Beverly Hills brunch, aggressively cutting her omelet. ”It was... lovely. I felt such a profound sense of... community. Yes. I thought of charity work and... holding hands with friends.”

She took a frantic, desperate gulp of her mimosa, terrified of being seen as a pervert, while the memory of the actual, intensely erotic hallucination the song had given her made her face flush scarlet.

******

So, after reading many comments, I decided to go with the original: Marvin playing Kurt, Jessica playing Eli, and Kate Beckinsale playing Selene.

So I can’t reply to your comments but don’t let that stop keep commenting. My Discord link is in my profile and also here.

Join my Patreon

GodofPleasure

(dot)com/GodofPleasure